this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
309 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 81 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hope that's true, but I have my doubts.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This particular trial covers events that happened during his presidency. Unless she says "Fuck it!" and declares most of his actions to be unofficial (which Trump will appeal) then there's going to be some serious gaps in evidence.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This particular kind of hearing might not necessarily need to conclude before the election to be impactful. Trump's lawyers arguing with a straight face that his alleged attempt at subverting the election was actually an official act just before the election could be fairly damaging on their own.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

None of that shit will matter to the voters. There are exactly two ways we will not see Trump in office again. 1. Voters. 2. He dead.

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 69 points 4 months ago

I said it before and I’ll say it again. I’ll fucking believe it when I see it.

So far all I’ve seen is someone blatantly breaking the law and only ever getting a finger wagged in their general direction. Our government has never looked so impotent.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 59 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Biden apparently has the power to just have Trump, the SCOTUS judges, and every other piece of shit taking this country right down the fucking toilet put to death and this ruling has made me wish he would do it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Hey guys, stupid question. With the supreme Court going haywire... Is there anything I can do other than vote? What are our options here? How do we change?

I'm depressed and frustrated.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Technically, you can go on a killing spree. But that's not exactly legal. Well, at least for us plebs.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I get cancer, I will eventually die. Hypothetically speaking, I may be looking for afterlife buddies that are worse people than me so I can feel better about myself comparatively

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe the afterlife sorting is graded on a curve.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Run for office (mostly too late at this time of year), donate to campaigns or PACs, volunteer at the polls (making sure things are on the up and up), join protests, start boycotts for companies that support fascists, call people in your area to make sure they know about deadlines and locations, volunteer to work for a campaign, or get a job in government (ensure duties are being performed by the law). That's only the stuff you can legally do.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I feel like my life shouldn't have to revolve around making sure dickheads aren't going to ruin everything.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

A perfect summary of the Human Condition.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

That thought is exactly why dickheads have ended up ruining everything.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I feel like we're beyond defending democracy only when it's convenient.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The answer has always been to vote. This country was founded on good faith and the naive belief that people would work for the common good. Your only recourse is to make sure that people who think that way are in power.

[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I've been trying bud :(

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago

Gotta start local and work your way up. The system is fundamentally flawed. There are many problems, but the most fixable is the voting and representation systems, which can usually be changed at the local level through referendum. Approval Voting is an easy fix with big impact and when applied to multi-winner elections you can use a proportional variant to get proportional results in the legislature. Both of these changes would reduce polarization and make it easier for third parties to get in office. With more than two parties in power, the parties have to start working together and compromising on things, instead of just obstructing until they're the majority and then jamming through partisan bullshit. But you gotta start local. Run a referendum campaign, switch your local elections to Approval, and work your way up.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

That depends on whether you value your own life more than you value the principles that we were led to believe America was founded on.

The discontent that led to the American Revolution didn't start overnight, but someone fired the first shot when the British were coming to confiscate the cannon that the colonists had collected.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago

Ah, well, you know those Trump supporters, always being swayed by facts and evidence.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago
[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

We've probably already seen the major stuff from the house committees investigation. If this does anything, it will only make it a little more fresh

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

They're circling him, won't be long now ... /s

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 4 months ago

EL oh el. Nothing backfires on Trump. His nickname is Teflon don for a reason. If anything his approval ratings will increase.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

"All the evidence is about to come out"

So, like, in 10-30 years?

Trump had legal issues that should have been processed (expedited) before he was 'elected' in 2016.

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago

Ah. Nevertheless,

load more comments
view more: next ›