this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

internet funeral

6872 readers
3 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

FACT: 90% of divers give up just before finding something really neat in an underwater cave

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Am I the only one for whom prefacing a statement with "FACT", makes said statement less credible?

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

FACT: ArcaneGadget thinks this statement is less credible.

[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Theres a good podcasts by stuff you should know on this. A scary thought to me is about kicking up sediment, causing zero visibility and they cant even see their hand in front of their goggles

[–] figjam@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

Caves are also not uniformly shaped, the way you go in could look a lot different on the way out.

New fear unlocked

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here is a clip from Donald Cerrone on the Joe Rogan show where he tells a story like this. I really loathe Joe Rogan but this story is fantastic. Nightmare fuel.

https://youtu.be/or92IMcLoIc?si=0CemG6Qopl_-Bl8d

I dare you to watch this and not get absolutely freaked the fuck out, lol.

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If this is the clip I think it is it’s been the joke of the cave diving community. Cerrone has almost reached meme status for this interview. Watch the Dive Talk video reacting to this clip if you’re curious.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for sharing, I'll look that up and check it out, as I'm really curious about things like this that I've not experienced. Regardless of whether he's an idiot or joke or whatever, I can totally see how a scenario like he describes could happen and how scary it could be. I definitely won't be trying to learn how to cave dive anytime soon.

Edit - here's the link to the dive talk video if anyone is curious like me

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m curious about your thoughts now that you’ve watched it.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

A couple takeaways for me after watching their breakdown -

  • They seemed to generally agree with a lot of his points, although he clearly came across to them as an inexperienced amateur with how he described things and gaps in his story.
  • Mofo should have NEVER let go of the line, or at minimum should have tied off on it when he went in to check on his buddy.
  • It was never clear in his story why he lost the line and had to exit the way that he did. When he said he came out of the silt on the further inwards side of the cave, he should have been able to just grab the line and then follow it out. That's the biggest WTF to me after watching.
  • Regardless of this dude's inexperience, and he's not a person I follow or anything, my original comment of that being a nightmareish scenario is definitely still valid. Feeling/becoming lost (even if it was due to your own stupidity) and knowing you're on a timer that's accelerating due to your panic would absolutely freak me out, and is enough where I don't think I'd ever want to cave dive. However, I'm usually a stickler for the rules, and I certainly wouldn't have let go I don't think. I'd want to ALWAYS be touching it or tied off against it. He was either a complete idiot or had an enormous amount of confidence in his abilities to free swim in an unfamiliar cave. Either way he was definitely showing his inexperience there.
  • Fuck underwater caves! Although it's super fascinating to me, lol.
[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've done training dives in man made quarries under zero visibility conditions. There's no way in hell I'd go into an actual cave under those conditions.

It was bad enough when you'd almost run into a purposefully placed sculpture or bathtub in that flooded quarry.

You had to do a scavenger hunt to find stuff to pass your training and it was super disorienting.

I don't know if PADI still does that sort of thing or if it was unique to my training center conditions but it was wild.

I'll stick to open water, thank you very much.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh those sorts of training conditions absolutely still exist. I got my rescue diving certification in an old quarry much like what you said. Really helps make you appreciate the conditions when out in the Caribbean and you have >100 ft of visibility in every direction.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Thats why we are highly sceptical of people who learned diving in the sea, often in a two weeks course on vacation, then wanting to dive in a lake. It is a typical thing to see, when there is deadly diving accidents.

Learn diving in lakes with the cold and low visibility and quick darkness, when going deeper. It is easier to go from there to the sea, than the other way round.

[–] Skipper_the_Eyechild@lemmings.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Farther is the correct word, and has been confused with further for so long (over a hundred years), that they both mean exactly the same thing nowadays, so not sure why people are taking issues with it.

Unless I'm missing something?

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't see any comments of people taking issue with it. But words do mean things, and some people like to speak with precision.

[–] whosdadog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Words apparently don't mean things anymore, Merriam Webster added a new definition for "literally" this year

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Merriam Webster is a descriptive dictionary. They don't tell you how words "should" be used, they say how words are used.

Using literally as an intensifier goes back literal centuries. The earliest written citation we've found of that usage goes back to 1769. It can be found everywhere from Dickens to Brontë.

It's also hardly the first word to go on a similar path towards becoming an intensifier. Very originally meant "genuine", really meant "in fact", absolutely meant "completely", etc.

But who complains about sentences like "I was really bored to death", or "I was absolutely rooted to the ground"? Does saying "it's very cold" just mean "it is a genuine fact that it is cold"?

Literally still means what it means. You can't use literally to mean "yellow", for example. People aren't generally confused when they come across the word.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

FACT: Fences are more effective than signs

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Especially at keeping people from getting out who tried getting in nonethless.

The worst thing you can do inder water is restrict peoples movement.