this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
163 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

39577 readers
305 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm going to move away from lastpass because the user experience is pretty fucking shit. I was going to look at 1pass as I use it a lot at work and so know it. However I have heard a lot of praise for BitWarden and VaultWarden on here and so probably going to try them out first.

My questions are to those of you who self-host, firstly: why?

And how do you mitigate the risk of your internet going down at home and blocking your access while away?

BitWarden's paid tier is only $10 a year which I'm happy to pay to support a decent service, but im curious about the benefits of the above. I already run syncthing on a pi so adding a password manager wouldn't need any additional hardware.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WMTYRO@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there an easy way to export passwords from LastPass to another service, self-hosted or otherwise? I’ve been wanting to move away from my current manager but have been reluctant due to this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not a piece of hardware instead of self hosting, cloud hosting, etc?

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm curious why your listed options are all software that runs on the internet as opposed to a piece of hardware that you connect to your devices.

Is that just because this is the self hosting community?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] astrsk@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

I self host services as much as possible for multiple reasons; learning, staying up to date with so many technologies with hands on experience, and security / peace of mind. Knowing my 3-2-1 backup solution is backing my entire infrastructure helps greatly in feeling less pressured to provide my data to unknown entities no matter how trustworthy, as well as the peace of mind in knowing I have control over every step of the process and how to troubleshoot and fix problems. I’m not an expert and rely heavily on online resources to help get me to a comfortable spot but I also don’t feel helpless when something breaks.

If the choice is to trust an encrypted backup of all my sensitive passwords, passkeys, and recovery information on someone else’s server or have to restore a machine, container, vm, etc. from a backup due to critical failures, I’ll choose the second one because no matter how encrypted something is someone somewhere will be able to break it with time. I don’t care if accelerated and quantum encryption will take millennia to break. Not having that payload out in the wild at all is the only way to prevent it being cracked.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Lots of people like and recommend Bitwarden. I think followed by KeePass on second place.

I self-host stuff because I can, because I learn something while doing it and it gives me control. And I'm running that server anyways, so I might as well install one more service on it. If you don't want to spend your time managing and maintaining servers and services, go for the official (paid) service. That'll do, too.

If you're worried about your internet connection going down, either use a VPS in a datacenter or just use software that syncs to your devices. I think Bitwarden does that, your passwords will be available without an internet connection to your server. They just won't get synced until the server is reachable again.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Thanks, I did consider the syncing would be fine. But if the reason to do it is just hobbying then I'll pass, I have too many hobbies at this point and managing what I'm already hosting is giving me enough of a scratch for that itch

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sure. I think there are some areas where self-hosting is kinda mandatory because other solutions don't fulfill my requirements. But I don't think a password manager is part of that. It stores the passwords encrypted in the cloud anyways, $0-$10 a year isn't much and I think Bitwarden has a good track record and you'll be supporting them. Self-hosting is a nice hobby and I think integral part of a free and democratic culture on the internet. But it doesn't have to be every tiny tool and everyone. Do it if you like, otherwise it's fine if you support open source projects by paying a fair price if you want convenience and they offer a good hosted service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

I run vaultwarden in a docker container and I can't say I've touched it since then. Its as much maintenance as all the other services I run. Reboot the server quarterly to make sure patches are applied. Docker containers patch nightly.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 days ago

I self-host Vaultwarden but I use a VPS where I keep things stable. My VPSes run Debian Stable and have unattended-upgrades installed and configured to automatically install security updates. My home server runs Unraid and is more experimental - I'm not running anything of critical importance on it.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Self-hosting removes the risk of somebody compromising Bitwarden’s servers and adding malicious javascript to send off your master password to a bad actor instead of just processing it locally like it’s designed to.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the chances of such a breach are vanishingly small. I wonder if I'm right though.

I think anyone capable of pulling off such a feat is not interested in my data, and probably more likely looking for government employee access etc..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Premium features for free. There are no benefits in relying on a third-party

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev -1 points 3 days ago

Do you mean 2nd party? If not, what is the 3rd party in this situation?

If you do mean 2nd party - you should have a read through this thread, tonnes of benefit to buying these services.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] calmluck9349@infosec.pub 0 points 3 days ago

I have bitwarden family SaaS. So I can share password with my group.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›