this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
900 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

If we launched enough of these assholes towards a Lagrange point between the sun and earth we could really cut down on climate change.

Just a thought.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Oh so we’re at the Hail Mary stage where we throw our hands up and say “fuck it”

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The problem, maximizing profits does meet the climate goals.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

theres a reason hes a former

[–] dubious@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i see a lot of naysaying in the comments and a lot of superstition.

the one thing you all got right is that it will never work in the hands of capitalists. however, that doesn't mean it wouldn't work in the hands of academia.

another thing that i think somebody in this comment section got right is the acceleration of fusion power. it's obvious that fusion power works. we just can't work out the details to make it net positive and scalable. i think those things are possible, and that we need all the help we can get to develop it.

something i don't see people mentioning is how an AI properly trained on human behavior could lead us down a path of sustainability without making us feel like we were forced to. with the right carrots and sticks, you can lead humanity to water and make it drink.

but none of this is possible without abandoning capitalism and unifying the world. we have to move away from nation states and fiat currency. and guess who are the people that stubbornly cling on to these concepts across cultures? conservatives and the religious - these are the two most cancerous concepts in the human species. roughly half of the human population across all cultures are backwards minded people clinging on to outdated concepts and unwilling to let go of the idea.

if you can figure out how to eliminate conservatism and religion, utopia is within reach.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

former Google CEO Eric Schmidt said ... that the demand for AI computing (this is its power requirement) is infinite and that the key point is “we’re not going to get there through conservation.”

The host then followed up with, “Do you think we can meet AI’s energy without total blowing out climate goals?” and Schmidt answered with, “We’re not going to hit the climate goals anyway because we’re not organized to do it — and the way to do it is with the ways that we’re talking about now — and yes, the needs in this area will be a problem. But I’d rather bet on AI solving the problem than constraining it and having the problem if you see my plan.”

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›