this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
894 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

58613 readers
4246 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These ppl just want poor people to die and be served by robots, it's never gonna work plus we'll bring them with us

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

When these weirdos get older they always stop giving a shit about anyone but themselves or more to the point they stop pretending they ever cared for anyone else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grid11@lemy.nl 3 points 3 days ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He just wants to run his ~~AI datacenters~~ gold mines, climate be damned. And looks like he himself sees AI as some kind of magic bullet, typical exec syndrome.

load more comments (1 replies)

Give the ring to Boromir, he will know what's best

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

I would be overjoyed if AI solved the coordination problem that's protecting him.

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 5 points 4 days ago

Eric and his dumbass wife Wendy need to move on. Nobody wants you meddling rich fucks around anymore.

[–] nroth@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Think a bit before you talk. Hard for all of us!

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

"Clearly we're not going to solve this, so just let us destroy the biosphere so we can be slightly richer when we die before the consequences of our actions are realized"

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

This is "Escalating to de-escalate" with climate change

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I wish someone could provide evidence that this would actually lead somewhere. The problem is even if AI isn't a white whale and actually does achieve the goals that the AI companies are telling us it will achieve. That still leaves us hoping that the AI can actually fix the problem quickly enough that the extra power that we required in order to create it, doesn't cancel out any benefit it can create.

I've yet to see anyone provide any evidence to suggest that this will necessarily be the case.

Also given the fact that AI companies are taking over nuclear power stations I'm not seeing much evidence of shackling going on.

load more comments (3 replies)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ oh well we tried….

GTFOH

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

If we launched enough of these assholes towards a Lagrange point between the sun and earth we could really cut down on climate change.

Just a thought.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That 'quote' on the title is not even remotely accurate.

We’re not going to hit the climate goals anyway because we’re not organized to do it — and the way to do it is with the ways that we’re talking about now — and yes, the needs in this area will be a problem. But I’d rather bet on AI solving the problem than constraining it and having the problem if you see my plan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

theres a reason hes a former

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›