this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
35 points (88.9% liked)

Pulse of Truth

477 readers
205 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ben Lovejoy / 9to5Mac: Apple's Activation Lock for iPhone components will make a huge dent in the market for stolen iPhones, though it introduces another barrier to DIY repairs  —  Apple's latest theft-prevention measure went live for beta testers yesterday: Activation Lock for iPhone components.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

So it's a win/win from their perspective.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm fine with this as long as they make good quality replacement parts. Not forcing repair shops to really try to scrub down a 50¢ sensor for an hour that detects when a MacBook is closed because there is no way to get a replacement 1st party or 3rd party

[–] GenosseFlosse 6 points 1 month ago

The problem is that you cannot use old devices for spare parts anymore and must buy and register everything from apple.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Why not just lock out the serial numbers for parts from phones that have been reported as stolen?

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

While annoying from a right to repair perspective, I do think this will be a good thing overall. There is a whole industry for snatching phones and getting them turned into parts.

In my city, go to the sketchy grocery stores and there are machines that you can just put a phone in and get cash for it. Pretty much no questions asked. Crackheads and tweakers on main street will smatch a thousand dollar phone out of someone hands so they can get $100 so someone can sell all the parts for a few hundred. I feel a pang of anger every time I see someone using one of those machines.

It's kind of a simular to how there is an underworld for cadaleidic converters. I guess the government can try to make laws trying to somehow regulate used phone parts, but I'm not sure how that'd actually be effective.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What's the barrier to DIY repair?

It is because people can't buy stolen parts anymore?

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Third-party parts: You are limited to parts acknowledged by apple. They will be more expensive for no reason and you will therefore be less inclined to repair your own device.

Artificial rarity:
They will be more rare and therefore you will be less inclined to repair.

Rare and overworked repair centers:
There will be a limited selection of repair stores, potentially entirely limited to the "genius bars" because of hurdles apple puts out and therefore you will be less inclined to repair.

Also additional point-of-failure:
Phones fail more often because every single part now has additional complexity.

On the other side the additional security against stealing:
Assumed, until a pairing software is stolen from an apple store, until people figure out how to read and fake this, or until people find ways to circumvent this in an unforeseen way.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is some seriously gish gallop. Nothing you've said is based on reality.

Do you want to go into any kind of detail?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the past, Apple has locked components to the phone by requiring proprietary pairing software to enable the use of these parts that only Apple technicians can access. This means that Apple gets a cut of any repairs and prevents you from doing repairs on your own for some components.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok and this specific change adds to that in what way?

Now the parts need additional registration at apple at the time of the pairing, I assume.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How about lowering the cost to prevent stealing? No way in hell an iphone cost 1200 eur to make. Plus since they make "the best hardware and software" everyone will want one and this will increase pressure on competitors to improve their products aswell.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

While cheaper phones would be great, this is not how economics work.