this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
139 points (96.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6656 readers
799 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamsite

Adamsite or DM is an organic compound; technically, an arsenical diphenylaminechlorarsine, that can be used as a riot control agent. DM belongs to the group of chemical warfare agents known as vomiting agents or sneeze gases.

I think that we can probably consider this a vomiting agent, same sort of idea.

https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/CSP/C-14/open-forum/Dangerous-Ambiguities-Regulation-of-Riot-Control-Agents-and-Incapacitants-under-the-Chemical-Weapons-Convention_Rev.1.pdf

The CWC is comprehensive in the toxic chemicals it regulates.

  • The definition of “toxic chemicals” under Article 2.2 includes chemicals that cause “temporary incapacitation”.
  • Under the Convention, the use of such “toxic chemicals” would be forbidden unless employed for “purposes not prohibited” and as long as the “types and quantities” are consistent with such purposes.
  • Among the “purposes not prohibited” is: “law enforcement including domestic riot control”.

I don't think that use of a tripwire trap could reasonably be domestic riot control, so that's probably in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Now, that's just a treaty, not customary international law, so it doesn't bind states not party to the treaty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Weapons_Convention

There are 193 states party to the treaty, but "Four UN states are not party: Egypt, Israel, North Korea and South Sudan." For them, use would be acceptable.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

There are 193 states party to the treaty, but “Four UN states are not party: Egypt, Israel, North Korea and South Sudan.” For them, use would be acceptable.

Anyone want to take odds on whether Egypt won't sign just because Israel won't sign? They're not exactly a frequent flier on lists of nations who don't support international law.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Well it's not not a war crime.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Technically, it's a lifetime supply of fish.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For a second I thought someone weaponized a garbage disposal...

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

You're not wrong.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Can't find a gif of it, but wasn't that the gag in Big Trouble?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's definitely a biological weapon.

[–] Successful_Try543 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Although it's from biological origin, one won't infect with surströmming when exposed to its aerosols, but one would suffer from the smell, thus it's a chemical weapon.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Yes, you are absolutely right. My mistake.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago

The font? Yes.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

If it isn't it damn well should be

[–] Grimmnir@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Weaponized as such, close enough.

Sealed tins with labels removed left in cupboards or on store shelves in areas Russian troops are moving in to and likely to raid or set up barracks or HQs, however?