In general, if you come to the correct number nothing will happen. You are technically committing perjury if you knowingly put incorrect information on a tax form, so I would avoid doing that to make a point. Do you have any specific examples of form fields you feel are overly intrusive?
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
3 points (66.7% liked)
US Law (local/state/federal)
44 readers
1 users here now
This is the only decentralized venue for chatter about law in the US. Federal law and law of various states and territories is on topic here.
Loosely related:
- !humanrights@lemmy.sdf.org - covers UN-wide discussion on human rights
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
Off the top of my head I recall questions about the taxpayer’s occupation, whether foreign bank accounts are held by the taxpayer and whether any digital assets are held. I think some forms (1116, perhaps) ask for country of residence but IIRC this has no influence on the calculations.
Accounts and digital assets seem directly applicable to assets held. Occupation sounds like it could have to do with tax credits, if you're in something that's subsidised.
Residence is weird but in the opposite way, because usually countries don't tax residents abroad. 'Murca is the exception there, although I don't know all the exact details.
Accounts and digital assets seem directly applicable to assets held.
And? Holding assets does not in itself trigger tax. Esp. how they are held. Whether your $100 is in a banknote or $100 in gold coins or Second Life game money, or $100 in a cheese wheel, in the absence of a transaction there’s no tax to speak of.
W.r.t accounts, it’s just foriegn accounts they want to know about, not domestic accounts. Walk me through the tax difference between the two (not interest, not cap gains, just having the account).
Occupation sounds like it could have to do with tax credits, if you’re in something that’s subsidised.
If that’s the case, that’s declared on a form that actually has effects on figures, which is not what I’m talking about. That would be an enumeration with a code that discretely assigns an activity from a list to an outcome. If you look at the signature box of the 1040, that’s just a freehand field. You can write “contractor” there or any number of vague things without affecting subsidies. I’m specifically talking about information that does not affect the figures.
Residence is weird but in the opposite way, because usually countries don’t tax residents abroad. 'Murca is the exception there, although I don’t know all the exact details.
Residence indeed affects the figures (whether you are inside or outside the US), but that’s already accounted for by the forms being submitted and the data on them. When a form arbitarily has a field for country of residence and that field in no way affects the figures, it’s extraneous info. Just a data collection that makes no difference to the bottom line. I just had a look at the 1116 form. Whether you write USA or Japan on the residence field makes no difference whatsoever in the in the calculation. You can write anything on that line and it does not change the calculation AFAICT.
I know in Canada foreign assets relate to eligibility for certain offices, although that's not a tax.