this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
-306 points (1.3% liked)

Santabot

25 readers
1 users here now

Santabot is an automated moderation tool, designed to reduce moderation load and remove bad actors in a way that is transparent to all and mostly resistant to abuse and evasion.

This is a community devoted to meta discussion for the bot.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Everything's been working smoothly, with nothing to report about the moderation bot. The community has been quiet but productive, which was precisely the goal, and the bot working smoothly with no issues. However, something almost went wrong in a particular entertaining fashion which I thought I would share.

The algorithm for classifying troll users doesn't have any polarity. It only knows which users are opposed to which other users. 50% of the time, it'll get its whole ranking system backwards, so the troll users are the normal ones, and everyone else gets negative rank, because the math works just as well under that ranking regime. Generally this isn't a problem, because there's a step:

        # Flip the sign if we arrived at a majority-negative ranking, which can happen
        if -min_val > max_val:
            rank[1:] *= -1

The most popular user is always more popular than the least popular troll is unpopular, by quite a big margin, so that works fine.

However. Things have changed. MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world is so unpopular that it's almost (1% margin) more unpopular than the highest-rank user is popular. If that had happened, the whole polarity would have flipped, every user would have been banned, all the trolls would have been unbanned. Mass hysteria. I only happened to notice it before it happened and stop the bot. It's on track to be the least popular user on Lemmy, with about 5 times lower rank than some of the most notorious trolls.

Have fun with this information. I started checking the median rank of all users, instead. Thanks MediaBiasFactChecker.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Crisis averted πŸ˜…

But yeah, the mbfc bot is annoying, I have blocked it as well.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

...Why didn't I think of doing this until now? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Bout to πŸ’₯ that block button so damn hard!

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why is the media bias bot so disliked?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The message formatting looks shit on a lot of lemmy clients

The source of the data is also pretty biased in general and does objectively malicious ratings like drawing a factuality equivalency between fairly trustworthy news outlets like The Guardian and the fucking far right conspiracy outlet, Breitbart.

The owner of the bot ignores this feedback and continues to spam every thread with it.

I've blocked it

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

For a deep dive, you can read the original post when it was unveiled for !politics@lemmy.world last month, or the feedback post when they expanded it to !news and !world despite its terrible reception.

I've made a number of comments about the flaws in their approach. If there's interest I might make a link collection. TLDR: MBFC is a joke, nobody in the fact-checking world or experience managing source credibility takes it seriously. The author/editor of the site has a right-wing, anti-Palestinian, and anti-LGBTQ+ bias.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The guy who maintains the database it pulls from has questionable bias himself, it's not unbiased itself like it implies.

But supposedly the guy's bias leans left sooo I personally have been fairly neutral towards it

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

The guy leans right, and leans Zionist.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As an outspoken critic of the MediaBiasFactChecker bot and the place of authority it gives to the deeply flawed site MediaBiasFactCheck.com, I find this hilarious.

MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world is so unpopular that it’s almost (1% margin) more unpopular than the highest-rank user is popular.

Thank you for sharing this statistic! I'm excited that my downvotes may have contributed to this record-breaking achievement.

[–] auk@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

Everyone played their part, I'm sure.

And yes, it's funny as hell. That's why I wanted to spread the word!