this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

English usage and grammar

363 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.

If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).

Online resources:

Sibling communities:

Rules of conduct:

The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.

(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
pglpm@lemmy.ca
pglpm@mander.xyz
pglpm@lemmy.sdf.org
1
... no chance of their getting caught. (feddit.de)
submitted 7 months ago by netthier@feddit.de to c/english@lemmy.ca
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello, English is my second language. I was just reading a sentence where I got a little confused with the use of "their":

In fact, the people prone to such behavior are liable to do it even more once there's no chance of their getting caught.

I've never heard "their" in this context, only "them getting caught". Is this correct grammar?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it's correct. "Getting caught" is a gerund and acts as a noun that they can possess, hence their getting caught.

Them getting caught is also correct but them acts as a direct object in this case. You could drop them and still have a readable sentence, "...no chance of getting caught", but them just adds more info.

Their getting caught has fallen out of use in American English in favor of them getting caught, but both are still correct. The former gives me a more formal feeling as well, suitable for academics.

[โ€“] netthier@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Thanks!