this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
376 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2113 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

In this generation helping home buyers is like helping the wealthy. Most of us have no hope in hell of ever coming close to buying.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This isn't fair to people like me, who were fortunate enough to buy their first house without 25k from the government. Won't someone think about how disadvantaged I am!

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

There are plenty of people that think this way. They'll happily slap a free glass of water out of a thirsty man's hand because they were there thirsty yesterday and no one offered them water.

Instead of being happy for the thirsty man getting some water, they'd rather he suffer the way they had.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

Harris is basically become Frodo Baggins and Walz is all about the PO-TAY-TOES

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Am I a first time home buyer if I moved for a job and have been renting at the new location for 3+ years?

[–] danafest@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I would take it to mean if you've never owned a home

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean that means if you can find 10 best friends you can all pitch in to put 50% down on a 500 sqft condo in a major city, right? This means its essentially paying a 7x7 ft square of housing at the federal level. Realistically they'd need to start at 90k and state and local govs should pitch in another 90k each to make home buying in most cities affordable.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You said this last time when you ran with Biden.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And? Was she some kind of dictator before and I missed it?

[–] whatevs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

this will get all kinds of messed up. I had one of these years ago. It used to be you had to take a home ownership course. Had to earn under X amount and not have owned a home in the prior 9 years. You had I think 10 months to find house.

NOW you have to be of a specific demographic, the sum us larger. and yay need ti already be in close on the house. Which is nuts because if you are already in closing there's a huge chance when you go to apply the funds are gone. Can't afford the house. Before, the grants were limited/. But you knew before CLOSE that they were out of grands for the year.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Finally, paying your rent on time will have some kind of reward.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›