this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
671 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32096 readers
712 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I’ve heard reasonably good reports about ublock origin lite (uBOL), the manifest V3 implementation. I haven’t made the jump yet, though.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

It is never going to work the same. They are talking about dropping it entirely.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shadycomposer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why does it need to run remotely hosted code though?

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because the ads constantly change across the websites. Adblocking is naturally a cat-and-mouse dynamic. However, the "remotely hosted code" Adblockers use is not exactly "code" (as in a JavaScript code, for example), it's more a Regex code containing patterns for the different websites and different behaviors (for example, the pattern for the pesky HTML element containing the ad, or the pattern for some ad-serving domain). Google is extrapolating their meaning of "remotely hosted code" purposely, so they can "justify" their measures.

[–] shadycomposer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Fair. Pulling rules makes sense. Code wouldn’t. (I wouldn’t consider regex as code.)

Thanks for the details.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago

Honestly, I blame developers who, some years ago, decided it was a good idea to centralize the browsers into the same engine. Yeah, it was hellish to maintain code for all browsers at the time (IE5, IE6, Firefox, Safari, etc), but it was paradise compared to our current scenario: at least we really had options: WebKit, Trident, Gecko, as well as lots of smaller, almost unknown engines. Now, all modern browsers are different wrappings of Chromium or Firefox, while most modern sites are developed without the active worry to keep Firefox compatible (one can notice how modern HTML5 features varies across both of them). It has no easy solution. Don't update, maybe? (Until sites start to complain about the outdated version)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›