this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
935 points (91.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

2872 readers
704 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 130 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How was it? The right says "we want to do genocide", the left says "no, we don't want any genocide". So the right responded "ok, so let's just do a little genocide", and the left responded "no, we don't want any genocide". And the centrist said to the left "see, You are the extremists, you don't want to meet in the middle".

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 73 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.
You take a step toward him. He takes a step back.
Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.

—A.R. Moxon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is perfect. The right has gone so far to the right that meeting in the middle is still very much on the right.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 months ago

The lesser evil, still being evil trope.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago

Fake might be the wrong word. To me it feels very real and very entrenched both due to our voting system and those two powerful parties being the ones with the power to change it. Plus both are beholden to interests other than those of the general population, so their stated platforms aren’t necessarily real. (This is not a both sides comment, one side is still far worse than the other)

It’s an emergent thing from other flaws in the system, and it is bad, but it feels all too real.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago (3 children)

We should not allow conservatives to get away with calling themselves centrist. "Centrists" are just conservatives who realize conservatives are definitely the bad guys.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago (22 children)

In international terms, even the Democrats are right of center.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

There's an old Soviet joke about Americans being so decedent that they required two fascist parties.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Our Overton window is rammed so far right in America Bernie Sanders here is considered a radically dangerous communist, but in any other country he's a slightly left democratic socialist.

It's dangerous to our discourse and continually shifts sentiment further and further right beyond all sanity.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

US politics have moved so far to the right that I'm pretty sure contemporary moderate Democrats are nearly interchangeable with Reagan-era Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 64 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Not wanting people to die is a leftist thing now?

[–] peto@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago

It's more the idea that everyone counts as people. The further right you go the smaller the group you assign full person status becomes. Liberals are OK with a bit of genocide and/or slavery as long as the victims are sufficiently poor, distant, and profitable.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Not wanting people to die is a normal and sane idea.

People are still who they are but the world we live in has for the last half century significantly shifted to state authotorian and fascist idealogy has flourished in our ego centric rewarding capitalist economy

Political Left in the US aligns with center in Europe. Only adding to the evidence that political labels are arbitrary and subjective.

Fascist attack normalcy and misinformation adds to confusion. You have to believe its us and them, you have to pick a side.

Decent people stay true to what they are, causing the people who are fooled to listen to fascists to now label you a vilified left. You then have the option to confirm to your centrists peers or to stay true to your original ideals.

Currently i am aligned with far left anarchism But i can perceive plenty of context and societal structures where my identical ideas could be perceived as conservative.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 29 points 3 months ago

America's political compass is weird. On one side you have a party that mostly just wants to keep the status quo, only really doing changes where it is already desperately behind the times. And on the other side you have the conservatives.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I had a weird experience with this "have to pick a side" issue just a couple days ago on a different lemmy. According to the moderators there, not being willing to use violence against protestors was the same as defending them

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pacifism being perceived as hostile by both sides of modern politics is a great summary for the state of things.

Also a huge red flag for what may still come, we may not all realize it but very important parts of our collective history are being decided on today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Political Left in the US aligns with center in Europe. Only adding to the evidence that political labels are arbitrary and subjective.

Dutch right wing conservative parties are further left than the US left. Not all of them, obviously/unfortunately, but they're there.

[–] pearable@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Basically.

For example, tens of thousands of people die every year in the US because of inadequate access to health care. Universal payer would be cheaper and result in fewer preventable deaths. Centrists do not support the policy and thus are willing to let people die in order to support the parasitic insurance industry.

The genocide in Gaza, homelessness, prison industrial complex, climate change, etc. all get people killed in preventable ways. But we have to protect the owner class so we're not going to do any of the clear solutions. Letting people die needlessly is an acceptable result.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 47 points 3 months ago (25 children)

Reminder that objective political centrism is either social democracy or democratic socialism.

Not Reagan.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure centrists think we're bad because we want to abolish private ownership of the means of production, unless "leftism" means something else where OP is from.

The political center wants to maintain the status quo with regard to private property.

Edited for clarity.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 28 points 3 months ago (3 children)

A big problem of this entire argument, particularly when Americans are making it, is that nobody seems to agree on who the "centrists" and "leftists" are supposed to be.

Turns out social democrats are pretty sure they're leftists, but everybody else self-identifying as a leftist is convinced they are indistinguishable from free market liberals, while free market liberals think they're center left while social democrats are pretty sure they are indistinguishable from neocons.

Unless you're in the US, where apparently social democrats are both far left and communists, the word socialism has about as much meaning as a Rorschard test card and hard left people seem to be a figment of an AI's imagination in that they appear to exist exclusively online.

So yeah, I really don't know what the OP is talking about, honestly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 32 points 3 months ago (4 children)

"I don't want to think, but I want to pat myself on the back for being Above It All™"

Cool cool cool. Be proud of your ignorance I guess?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Some are proud of their ignorance, some seem to think that hating everything means they are intelligent with discerning tastes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Hold up... Are centrist people now lumped together with right wingers?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the problem is that people are called centrists because their major opinion is simply "the status quo is fine", which is effectively just being a conservative but without the active outspoken racism.

The centre party here in sweden meanwhile actively promotes LGBT rights and obvious things like that, they actually have opinions on both sides of the spectrum and a vision for the future, and that vision is one that you might not consider optimal but it's not obviously fucking evil.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But then they're not centrist. If these people are conservative minus active racism, then they're just "RIGHT WING lite."

Why destroy the whole concept of centrism that way?

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

This issue doesn't stem from the left, it stems from many self-proclaimed centrists actually espousing right wing ideology to the point it has become almost a dogwhistle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Centrists are seen as fence sitters because they are ok with the horrible things the system has baked into it, as they are comfortable enough to refuse to take a hard stance against it. Right wingers are people who actively destroy things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atkion@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

In general maybe not, in these lemmy spaces absolutely.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don’t think centrists are against socialised health care.

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are people in this thread who think being centrist means you're ok with a little genocide. What do you even say to that?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (6 children)

By answering whether someone like Joe Biden is a centralist and whether his actions contribute to genocide.

The reason your confused is because leftist have seen examples of people calling themselves centralist and also being okay with what is going on in Gaza.

By being okay I mean not trying to stop it actively.

It’s important to define what we mean when we use these terms/phrases.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My brother called me the other day, and after explaining how nature isn't "take or be taken from" when there's enough to go around. We got more into the myths about humans we're taught, and eventually he asked how I identify politically, and about the difference between a leftist and a liberal

I told him liberals want the system to work, to be fair. Leftists look around and say "there's so much food we leave a third of it to rot, why the fuck are people starving? What the fuck are we doing? No one is happy with the world we've created, why are we doing it? Why don't we start with the assumption that everyone gets to live, and figure out the details from there?"

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Leftists/progressives say "the reason for all of that is the oligarchy hoarding all the resources, so we need to start with stopping them from doing that"

Liberals kinda want the same things as progressives, but they don't want to "hurt " the rich to get it. But of course if 5 people are hoarding literally everything the only way to get more for everyone is to take it from those 5 people. Liberals just can't get themselves to take that next step.

(This is US liberal btw, might be different in Europe)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I’m a centrist. I live in Canada. We have public health care here. Even right wingers here like it. People who are against public health care aren’t ideological, they’re in the pockets of private insurance.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it's not ideological, why is it always the conservatives in Canada and the UK trying to dismantle public healthcare? Come the fuck on.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Same pattern holds here in Sweden. It’s definitely ideological. The right wing ideology of “fuck you, I’m lining my pockets”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago

i like how this image is three different posts tied together precariously.

[–] JayK117@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

There is also a point for the left not wanting to alienate all their voters so they are wanting to start slow. Personally I see this as a progress point for how left a country is. If their left is saying a little genocide okay it's probably a right leaning country.

load more comments
view more: next ›