Agreed. Especially when you consider that even fictional general AIs centuries more advanced than we are capable of making, such as Data or Isaac, aren't clearly shown to actually have what we call a soul, even if they're really good at emulating people.
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
Technology
34789 readers
417 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
If "what we call a soul" means consciousness, then I doubt there's a way to prove that anything else than your own self can be shown to actually have a soul. Not even what we call "other people".
You being aware of your own consciousness doesn't mean every human necessarily is in the same, right? ..and since we lack of a way to prove consciousness then we can't assume other people are any more conscious than an AI could be.
I agree with this, it's impossible to prove that other people are the same as you. Still, I have this feeling about AI atm. Maybe I just haven't encountered one ^^
Do you think creating a "real AI" is possible with computers as we have now (but more powerful)?
I feel like technically it could be possible, but if it is it still is far away.