this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Science Memes

10897 readers
3405 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Haven't we already confirmed ignition and just entered the "how do we sustain this at scale?" phase of the development?

[–] Mo5560@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Haven't we already confirmed ignition?

Not that I know of. You can obviously just neglect most energy costs when considering "ignition" and the proclaim you've achieved ignition. These may legitimately be significant advances but it doesn't mean we're ready to start thinking about actually sustaining fusion energy at scale.

[–] Fleur__@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who cares if its not gonna be practical, science funding is good and there are lots of things to be learned even from unsuccessful fusion projects.

[–] Obonga@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

This is the right answer. Humanity should not stop to be curious simply because it does not turn a profit.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Random_German_Name@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

hehe funny graphs