this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53843 readers
567 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This app has an easy downloader of music and music albums from Youtube Music, so it's definitely an awesome piracy tool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

so youtube-dl (forgot the other better tool name) but with automatic tagging? Neat!

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I used both this and yt-dlp for downloading albums. This seems smoother since it has a UI.

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] gaael@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it's a matter of personnal preferences and use case.

I love CLI mainly because it allows me to sceipt suff, but lots of people don't mind actually seeing what they are doing and clicking on stuff to achieve it.

It's a good news there are piracy tools with a CLI, makes it more accessible to more people - and we should rejoice about it.

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

For lots of archiving you want scripting. Same for whole albums of songs (i assume every song one item).

That is why cli>gui. In other use cases gui is better (complex video editing via ffmpeg alone would be interesting for example). And then there is jdownloader :(

Imo, the more complex and visual a task, the more likely it is for a gui to be preferable.

load more comments (2 replies)