this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23387 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman claimed music exec "sexually abused, forcibly touched, and subjected [her] to sexual harassment and retaliation." Iovine says that "no one has ever made a claim like this"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's a suspicious defence. There's always a first time right?

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To be fair the full quote is:

“No one has ever made a claim like this against Jimmy Iovine, nor have we been contacted or made aware of any complaint by anyone, including this unknown plaintiff prior to now.”

Also the complainant filled anonymously, which is her right, and "the legal filing contained little additional information regarding the woman’s specific claims." So there isn't much he could specifically respond to. There will most certainly be at least a civil suit and I'm sure more details will emerge then.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The full quote doesn't make it any better IMO. The context you provide does provide some explanation, but an explanation to a response he didn't give.

If he had said something along the lines of "I have received this complaint and while there are not enough details to specifically respond I look forward to defending myself in court" that would have been another matter entirely.

The response he actually gave just sounds suspicious. There's not enough to claim any knowledge of wrongdoing but it also doesn't give off an air of confidence in his innocence.

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad you're not on the jury

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? I haven't reached any conclusions either way because I haven't heard the facts yet. I have an open mind towards all possibilities. Isn't that what you would be looking for on a jury?

[–] toastus@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

In your original post you called it a

suspicious defence.

To me (and seemingly to others) it is weird that you interpret anything at all in this blanket response by some spokesperson.

I know nothing about this Iovine guy.
If he did it he should be punished, if he didn't he should be exonerated.
But this spokespersons PR statement doesn't make him any more or less suspicious to me and I find it kind of weird that it would for anyone.

Btw I am not one of the people that downvoted you, I'm just trying to clear up possible confusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)