I make the trip to Melbourne and back once a year on the sleeper and I have mixed feelings. I love the idea of going to sleep at night and waking up in Melbourne. The trip is perfectly timed, ie. you get off work, home / shower and back to Central for the evening departure, then in Melbourne before the day starts. That is all of the good bits. The not so good bits, the train is old so trying to go to sleep on it is near impossible, it creaks, it rattles continuously in ways you cant fix, the blinds hardly ever shut completely, the toilet/shower between the two cabins has never been upgraded since 1983 and the cabin service seems poor value.

The complimentary meal is a packet of 3 crackers with tomato relish, a small pack of savory sticks and a small cup of water. Breakfast since COVID is cereal and a cup of tea/coffee (before COVID you could choose toast). While I am sure the sleeper service is more comfy than sitting up, it is generally just sad / old train that will probably be in service for another 20 years.

Also, you aren't meant to use the power sockets in the sleeper carriage for anything other than a shaver. Once again, hasn't been upgraded since 1983 so the power is not very stable for electronic devices.

I am not sad they are stopping the sleeper, but I will just fly from now on.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The xpt is kinda crap, and it's at the point where flying is cheaper. This is only through throwing all the damage planes do into "externalities" though.

Flying is hell, emissions wise and for those who live near airport. It's a practice we need to move away from.

Trains aren't perfect, but with outlay to improve them and the lines they can become more attractive, and if flying's cost reflects its harm the use of them will inevitably rise. Trains also service the communities they pass by, allowing them access to metro centres. Planes do nothing for the people they fly over.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

All good points. I don't think I could sleep sitting up overnight, so that is why I would opt to fly. The only attractive thing about the train is I can try sleep laying down. I guess I will give the new train a try when it comes along but it isn't sounding great considering the length of the journey

I do like the start of the article where he talks about the dream train sleeper journey.. it sounds magical

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@kowcop @naevaTheRat Heads up @timrichards, there's quite a discussion about your article over on Lemmy.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

we're on lemmy. In Aussie Zone. Where else is article?

[–] ajsadauskas@aus.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@naevaTheRat The author (Tim Richards) is a fairly regular Mastodon user. (Lemmy posts also appear on Mastodon.)

I thought I'd tag him in so he can see the discussion...

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh did you mean there's a large discussion on masto? you wrote lemmy and I got confused

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think they thought Tim richards wouldn’t realize the conversation was here on lemmy otherwise. With the username tagging, this user could be accessing the thread through mastodon

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)