this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
3083 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube’s ad blocking crackdown is facing a new challenge: privacy laws | Privacy advocates argue YouTube’s ad blocker restrictions violate the European Union’s online privacy laws.::YouTube is launching a “global effort” to crack down on ad blockers, but some privacy advocates in the European Union argue that it’s illegal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ragerist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wouldn't Netflix's password sharing fall under the same law then?

They use user information like connected wifi and position data to determine if a device is used away from the defined "home".

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No.

Netflix logging your IP is the equivalent of taking a photo of someone in public. Not ideal if you're into privacy, but it's a public place, so it's your problem. YouTube's Adblock detection is equivalent to patting them down to see if they have a weapon and requiring their ID. The software actively looks for changes, using technology that could detect what extensions you have installed, gather data to profile you better for ads, and monitor what you're doing in your browser while the tab is open.

Both are ultimately for the same purpose, to prevent people from avoiding to pay them, but methods matter.

[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MrOxiMoron@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, so basically blacklisting email sender's on ip address isn't allowed either? When is an IP address, an individual and when is it just a machine in the cloud?

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What matters is the association of the IP to a person or account. If you receive spam and block the source IP it's not personal data. If you create an account on a website and they store your IP to it then it is.

Handling IPs for necessary technical service protection can also be acceptable without explicit consent as long as it's limited/temporary (you may be able to handle that without account association in the first place anyway).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)