The current stuff is smoke and mirrors and not intelligent in any meaningful sense, but that doesn't mean it isn't dangerous. It doesn't have to be robots with guns to screw over people. Just imagine trying to get PharmaGPT to let you refill your meds, or having to deal with BankGPT trying to figure out why it transfered your rent payment twice. And companies are sure as hell thinking about using this stuff to get rid of human decisionmakers.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is totally true but that's a different direction than the danger in the marketing as discussed above.

The media is full of "AI is so amazingly great, we are all going to lose our jobs and it will take over the world."

That's a quite different message than what's really the case, which is "AI is so shitty, that it will literaly kill people with bad advice when given the chance. And business leaders are so shit that they willingly trust AI, just because it's cheaper."

[–] visak@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they got the "will take out jobs part" just not the "will take our jobs and be worse at it and companies will still prefer it".

I was around in the 80s when we were losing all the manufacturing jobs, mostly to outsourcing but they blamed automation, and they said "don't worry there will be lots of good paying jobs in the new service economy!". Guess what they outsourced those too and now they'll automate them.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

It will be interesting how it plays out. For some jobs, mainly stuff that wasn't important but needed doing anyway (e.g. writing product listing on Amazon), this will be fatal. These jobs aren't coming back.

But for more skilled jobs, it will be interesting how they will deal with it when AI will mess up important stuff every single time.

On the other hand, managers have been doing the same consistently for a much longer time and they still exist. Let's see what happens.