this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)

Wikipedia

1505 readers
145 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 23 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The one part I haven't heard mentioned in other articles or videos about this is

Since the end of atmospheric nuclear testingbackground radiation has decreased to very near natural levels,[5] making special low-background steel no longer necessary for most radiation-sensitive uses, as brand-new steel now has a low enough radioactive signature that it can generally be used.

I guess I assumed it would linger around for decades to come

[–] Senshi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

People tend to vastly overestimate the impact of radiation and fallout. Even the by a very large margin worst nuclear disasters, Fukushima and Chernobyl, have not killed more than 100.000 people. And especially Chernobyl, with the reactor core being openly burning while melting down, generated immense amount of highly radioactive ash and dust that was deposited in the area.

Nuclear weapons, especially thermonuclear devices which have been the mainstay since the 1950s, excel at using almost the entire nuclear fuel provided to generate raw energy. There simply remains extremely little radioactive material that isn't fissioned or fused into stable compounds in very short amounts of time during and immediately after the explosion. There's always gonna be some grams of material with longer half lives, but as others correctly pointed out: the longer the half life, the less radiation per minute it generates. And even this remaining radiation can easily be contained when the weapon is detonated underground, which was the norm after the 1963 partial test ban treaty.

load more comments (4 replies)