this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
35 points (88.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

18288 readers
31 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't say Bazzite as I wasn't able to get SteamVR working on it. I'm looking for alternatives. The current plan is to try plain old Ubuntu instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (21 children)

I'd use Fedora over Ubuntu now. Ubuntu has lost the crown of cleanest and most usable with all the Snap BS.

[–] who 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Ubuntu has lost the crown of cleanest and most usable with all the Snap BS.

For anyone else reading along, Fedora isn't the only good alternative. There are also distros without the corporate ties that Fedora has. For example, Mint and Mint Debian Edition, both of which are will be more familiar if you're coming from Ubuntu.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I downvote this every single time I see this. This is just not true.

In the same way Mint relies on Canonical to keep Ubuntu chugging along, Red Hat contributes to the Fedora community. It's a symbiotic relationship, so think of that what you will, but there is functionally no difference between RedHat<>Fedora and Canonical<>Mint.

Both Mint and Fedora are community projects licensed and attributed as such, and neither corporate entity could take ownership or close either one.

[–] who 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Both Mint and Fedora are community projects licensed and attributed as such, and neither corporate entity could take ownership or close either one.

I wasn't suggesting that they would. Rather, I was referring to the strong influence that Red Hat has over Fedora. It might be fine for people who love Red Hat's design choices, but not so much for people who don't. That's why I mentioned Mint as an alternative.

there is functionally no difference between RedHat<>Fedora and Canonical<>Mint.

There is, because Debian is upstream of Canonical/Ubuntu. This means Mint can easily sever ties with the latter. In practice, Mint has opted out of Ubuntu-isms more than once, and already maintains a distro based directly on Debian.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)