this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
17 points (90.5% liked)

Australia

4144 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
Nath@aussie.zone
17
Housing, we all know (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world to c/australia@aussie.zone
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It seems a good time to remember, in amongst the rhetoric of election campaigns that all parties will keep house prices where they are.

The way back to affordability is 10-20 years of marginal house price growth, to enable housing to come into line with long term trends. Fluctuations that are radical pose radical problems for politics. So they opt for the sustained. This is what I think Australia's (and others) future housing comes down to the (continued) debasement of currency through broad (stealth) taxation.

What a game.

I suspect voting preferences will swing around the late 30s quite bad :-/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way back to affordability is 10-20 years of marginal house price growth, to enable housing to come into line with long term trends. Fluctuations that are radical pose radical problems for politics. So they opt for the sustained. This is what I think Australia's (and others) future housing comes down to the (continued) debasement of currency through broad (stealth) taxation.

Is this what you support or this you're description of current policy?

I suspect voting preferences will swing around the late 30s quite bad :-/

Pardon?

[โ€“] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That is my read of the current policies. And political mechanics (no matter which party).

If home ownership continues to drop at current rates, by 2030s there will be a majority of non-home-owner voters, who will swing the political sphere, as home owners have been doing.