this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
313 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Another arm in the arms race. The next gen of face generation will have this mastered.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Does it really work like that? I would say that they are not trying to fool any test, just getting harder to be detected. The goal being looking completely realistic.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

This is one of the basic techniques to spot AI fakes:

  • Correct number of body features (limbs, fingers, eyes...)
  • Non-intersecting body features
  • Surface continuity (skin, clothes, walls...)
  • ➡️ Eye reflections
  • Consistent illumination of features
  • Consistent shadows
  • Consistent reflections of illumination and shadows

The "test" they're trying to fool, is kind of the Turing test: whether humans can tell them apart.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Consistent illumination and shadows is a rabbit hole we really don't want to hop into.

Outside of very obvious anomalies even a trained eye will have a hard time discerning what's going on.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Some are very easy to spot, like a shadow of a character, that's missing a limb on the shadow, or has different placement or pose. Illumination or parallel surfaces where they vary in shadowing without a reason, is also a dead giveaway. But the mist damning evidence is having one scene, then a slightly different scene in a reflection.

There are reasons for human authors to do any of these on purpose, but unless that purpose is part of the work, they're most likely AI mistakes.

Of course it's kind of funny how there is already a large overlap between the best AI art, and the most senseless "modern art".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)