this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
17 points (87.0% liked)

Canada

9591 readers
1744 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Non-paywall original article: https://apnews.com/article/earth-day-clothing-synthetic-fibers-microfibers-microplastics-7ba38acebdb1ab73a6580f3196279553

I have to say, I'm pretty skeptical about the non-filter solutions here. Fibres are small. I don't think a net bag or plastic doohicky will catch many, unless someone can scientifically prove otherwise.

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even if the solution did work, now you have a doohicky full of microplastics. You can't throw it out because that puts you at square one. Are we shoving it in the walls like razor blades in the 70s and hoping for a solution in the future?

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Being buried in a landfill would be better than in the water supply.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would the co2 released from burning it be better or worse than the micro plastics?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, right? Microplastics don't cause any global warming, they're just a direct health risk to people and to wildlife, to some poorly-understood degree.

You really have to weigh one crisis against another, logically speaking. Unfortunately, it all gets jammed into "environmentalism" as one amorphous mass.

load more comments (1 replies)