People Twitter

4931 readers

1774 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying.
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

876

Sizing pants: men's vs women's (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Bullshit! I wear size 34 pants with a belt to keep them on and they are 36.25in around.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I wear 33W pants but they measure 36" around the belt loops. This isn't the result of vanity sizing, though - men used to wear pants that were very high-waisted, but as pants got lower over the decades they kept using the "nominal" waist measurement so that men would still know what size to buy, since the circumference around the hips (where most pants are cut today) is about 3" ~~less~~ more than the circumference of what used to be the waist.

Pleats are another useless holdover from the high-waisted era, as they made it easier for pants to expand down over the hips and thighs.

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know, maybe your pants are half an inch thick, and you overlooked accounting for that

load more comments (4 replies)