this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
429 points (99.8% liked)

Futurology

1865 readers
85 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 19 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Don’t aircraft still use leaded fuel to this day?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

So uh, there was some studying being done at my local university about mapping health issues for residents living closer to airports and.... It ain't too great. :(

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's probably related to all the other chemicals they use at airports (eg forever chemicals in fire retardant). 100LL (100 octane low lead) is only used in small piston engines, which is a very small population. They're trying alternatives that don't use lead, but I'm reading that the top contender is eating through paint and possibly gaskets and seals in the plane, which isn't safe either.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, fuels are funny like that, rocket fuel kept dissolving chunks of ground crew for the longest time

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't tell if this is a joke or legit lmao

A bit hyperbolic but seriously, look up hypergolic propellants.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)