this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
365 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

60133 readers
2488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

That's not a bad way of defining it, as far as totally objective definitions go. $100 billion is more than the current net income of all of Microsoft. It's reasonable to expect that an AI which can do that is better than a human being (in fact, better than 228,000 human beings) at everything which matters to Microsoft.

[–] brie@programming.dev 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good observation. Could it be that Microsoft lowers profits by including unnecessary investments like acquisitions?

So it'd take a 100M users to sign up for the $200/mo plan. All it'd take is for the US government to issue vouchers for video generators to encourage everyone to become a YouTuber instead of being unemployed.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I suppose that by that point, the AI will be running Microsoft rather than simply being a Microsoft product.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

Maybe it'll be able to come up with coherent naming conventions for their products. That would be revolutionary

[–] brie@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

AI is already running all software companies as the principle growth philosophy, but that's like saying that gold used to run Colorado and California in 1800s. The executives have no choice at all but bet all in on AI now.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That’s basically Neuromancer, and at this point it seems that big tech companies are reading dystopian cyberpunk literature as next-gen business advice books, so you’re certainly right

load more comments (9 replies)