this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
901 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1859 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 37 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (28 children)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

This is just homophobia, by the way

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please do fuck off with that shit, Karen.

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 hours ago

I remember when calling someone a Karen was a word with a meaning, specifically calling out bigoted white women - those who would punch down. This is the opposite; someone calling out bigotry.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 13 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Assuming good faith question: The (false) dichotomy of top/bottom implies a power dynamic in which the bottom is subservient to the top. In reality, it's often a simple preference and bottoms can domineer just as well as tops. Some prefer it that way. And there's more than top and bottom. Versatile is the obvious third option (no or changing preference for position) as well as side (prefers non-penetrative sex).

There's this stereotype (may not be the right word) that extends from the above in that tops are more masculine or powerful by virtue of topping, due to the tie with being dominant. Thus bottoms are more feminine and subservient. All of that is false and represents the gay community in a pretty bad, oversimplified, sexist-somewhere-along-the-line way.

The dom/sub axis is not the same as the top/bottom axis (not really an axis).

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Sure, but the joke here is turning the dumb jokes of the homophobes against them, right? Calling a homophobe "haha u'r gay n a bottom" is kinda using their homophobia against them, no?

Also, I'm gay myself. If someone said "haha, u like taking it up the ass", I would be like, "sure I do!". Say this to a homophobe n they would be incredibly offended. So ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

But sure, I get why the morals of this aren't so straightforward.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago

You aren't wrong. It's rather philosophical at that point. There's the "don't say it because it's shitty angle" (quasi-mine, though mine was more a explanation vs a held belief) vs the "take it back from them" angle. Both have pros/cons and I'm not going to pretend I have the 'perfect' answer. The truth is probably that whichever is more effective/least damaging probably varies by context.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It’s not just the top/bottom part that’s problematic, it’s the entire post. The punchline is “Trump and Elon are gay for each other, isn’t that funny?” which centers the idea that it would be bad or wrong for them to be gay for each other, perpetuating the conservative stereotype that there’s something wrong with being gay.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Oh FFS.

We (gay people) have been pointing out the hypocrisy of homophobes with this sort of joke for ages and will continue to do it because it's fucking hilarious. We are, in doing so, celebrating that it's wonderful to be gay and sad that they don't see that or see there at times in-the-closet-like behavior.

The last thing thing I need is a bunch of word police telling me what I can and cannot say.

You know who IS making it seem like there's something wrong with being gay? People like you.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

As a “joke” it treats being gay as derogatory. You’re welcome to make shitty homophobic jokes if you want to.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Are you gay?

Are you not ok with being gay if you are? Are you not and experiencing latent homophobia?

Because that's the only way you can possible conclude that it's derogatory to call someone gay.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 minutes ago

lol, the idea that I’ve said there is something wrong with being gay or being called gay is rich.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Good call, I missed it. We've got layers of shittiness in this meme.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

This is just absolutely ridiculous. It's thought police over-engineering for clout.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 3 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

It's a dissection of why some people in the LGBT community may be offended. If you're unwilling to try to see the perspective of others and choose to instead reject empathy, that's a problem for you and the people around you. This internet stranger will continue to have a good day.

Also, clout? On Lemmy? Oh good, I've got the support of all 12 of us...

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 0 points 16 minutes ago

It’s a dissection of why some people in the LGBT community may be offended. If you’re unwilling to try to see the perspective of others

I don't think you see the hypocrisy in your own comments.

Empathy would be you not trying to tell people what to think and say and being willing to see their perspective.

Also, clout? On Lemmy? Oh good, I’ve got the support of all 12 of us…

Hey maybe that's meaningful to you. It certainly seems to be to many.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

you really can't see how using sexuality to mock someone you hate is homophobic?

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

you really can’t see how using sexuality to mock someone you hate is homophobic?

It's not using sexuality to mock someone. It's using hypocrisy to mock someone.

You know what's the same thing? When gay men call each other fags or lesbians dykes. It's taking what was intended as derogatory and flipping it around to celebrate it. It's the ideal response to bullying assholes of any kind.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

It's not using sexuality to mock someone. It's using hypocrisy to mock someone.

I guess it would make it okay to call a black right-winger an N-word and talk about how he can't swim and only eats chicken and watermelon, then?

When gay men call each other fags or lesbians dykes

and I'm sure you know that not everyone is comfortable doing that because of their lived experiences. it's awesome that homophobic jokes don't affect you, but not everyone can distance themselves from them.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

I guess it would make it okay to call a black right-winger an N-word and talk about how he can’t swim and only eats chicken and watermelon, then?

If you are black, yes, it would be ok. And many black people do. It's the exact same defense mechanism.

and I’m sure you know that not everyone is comfortable doing that because of their lived experiences.

Then let them not be comfortable with it and let me and my people alone. Do not try to police my language just because perceive someone somewhere to have experienced some mild discomfort... and why? WHY DO I SAY THIS?

Because honey, they need to arm themselves against that discomfort. You need to have a shield and that shield is OWNING the words. If you let people who use derogatory words own them you have lost power.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 34 minutes ago (2 children)

Calling a homophobe gay isn't homophobia though, is it

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 25 minutes ago

Yeah, it is. It reinforces the idea that there is something wrong with a gay homophobe being gay, rather than the problem being that they are a homophobe.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 28 minutes ago

it's perpetuating the view that calling someone "gay" is somehow an insult.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

... you could just explain your logic you know.

It isn't the general consensus.

calls out a post for being homophobia topped with an extra serving of homophobia

less upvotes than someone who thinks “haha gay” isn’t homophobic

😒

Thanks for trying.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

This is just homophobia, by the way

Tell us you are not a gay man without telling us you are not a gay man.

Edit: Probably 85% of my social circle is some delicious flavor of queer. Kinda comes with being queer I guess. We make these jokes in part to normalize this sexuality and to make fun of hypocrites and bullies. It's the same thing as when the kid in school says "that's so gay" and you reply "oh really? You wanna get together later?". This has come up a few times - the sensitivity of some groups to these kinds of jokes - and the conclusion is basically that people who object to them are generally either not queer or insecure about being queer and want to exert control over the conversation either to get cred with the community or to assuage their fears.

load more comments (24 replies)