this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
12 points (92.9% liked)
Pulse of Truth
528 readers
64 users here now
Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).
This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd argue the insurance has the opposite effect. To qualify for the insurance in the first place means requiring having protections in place.
I do know of the 50+ companies I've helped recover operations from those with insurance were usually much better off in the extent of the damage. One downside of the insurance is you have to keep operations offline until they give you the go ahead to reuse the existing infrastrucure for recovery.
So rather then hackers benefiting, the rich owning insurance companies are those benefitting along with the companies themselves from being forced to do security.