this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
1012 points (94.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5885 readers
3908 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Your first source is a costume-designer with a very obvious agenda talking about European history. She sources little of her statements, some of them with actual pieces of fiction (including anachronistic art).

Your second source basically amounts to "contemporary writers didn't say there weren't Africans in Europe *wink*". It's written like your typical ancient aliens stuff.

The third describes more the spread of influence than the actual populace, and is written by Runoko Rashidi, an afrocentrist "historian" who liked to claim historical figures were black in spite of when evidence to the contrary existed. These folks are colloquially known as "hoteps" in some circles.

Obviously given the nature of humans, cultures, and empires, it is likely some amount of black Africans ended up in Europe. That said, given historical records as understood by actual historians, we have reason to believe there were not many of them. Why does it even matter though? What would black Africans being in Europe even prove?

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I disagree that the first source has an agenda, it seems more that she’s just enthusiastically describing her subject matter. She cites other scholars and artwork, which isn’t necessarily anachronistic as it was made at that time. I’d say the same about the second source.

Here’s some more art work being described. The source is approachable and meant to encourage further reading for anyone interested, https://www.thehumanityarchive.com/articles/black-people-medieval-europe

For the last source, maybe that person had a pov to sell so it does make them less reliable, but if other historical artifacts or sources prove them right, then overall point of this remains the same.

The reason I brought it up was because someone said colored POC didn’t make sense in a medieval Europe game setting. I agree that there were probably less of them, but including the presence of such people in a game setting is just reality. Why is that such an issue for people? Those people need to get over it.

Here’s more scholarly resources https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0326.xml

https://journalofsocialsciences.org/vol6no1/blacks-in-the-middle-ages---what-about-race-and-racism-in-the-past-literary-and-art-historical-reflections/

And a more approachable one, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/deconstructing-the-moors-black-presence-the-united-kingdom-and-during-the-tudor-period

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

in this case i think we can all tell that "no" means "practically none" not like there was some law of physics stopping it

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s practically wrong, though

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, but that's not going to stop the anti-woke crowd from Um AkShUaLlY-ing the situation to try to pretend it's not just some racist dog whistle.