this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
122 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17953 readers
108 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
122
SerenityOS and LadyBirds: Because These Things Shouldn't Hide in Closed Git Conversations - ░ Nova Online (cmdr-nova.online)
submitted 4 months ago by Luci@lemmy.ca to c/foss@beehaw.org
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Found this blog post and found it had more insight into the issues around the dev and the toxicity in FOSS

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand the point you're trying to make

[–] The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Imagine you have been purposefully targeted for harassment or excluded from activities in the past due to your preferred pronouns or perceived gender. Seeing "he" with that context would likely feel excluding, which is a reason someone without an 'agenda' would want to see it changed.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

someone … would want to see it changed

So, by definition, “someone” has their own agenda.

[–] Lionir@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago

It's worth understanding that "agenda" has a negative connotation. In this context, it's used as a dogwhistle against women and queer people.

[–] The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago

By definition, an agenda is "a program of things to be done or considered" which does not equate to wanting to do something. It more closely resembles a daily planner or task list.

So in as much as you and I have an "agenda" when we get out of bed, you are right, the person submitting the PR did likely have an agenda of waking up and going about their day. There isn't a 'woke agenda' at play here, however, as the person I replied to seemed to imply.