Apple

17524 readers

3 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

Apple iPhone 16 loses out to Samsung Galaxy A35 and Google Pixel 8a in DxOMark display analysis (www.notebookcheck.net)

submitted 1 month ago by Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

At a starting price of $799, the Apple iPhone 16 costs more than many flagships, but the 60 Hz OLED display cannot even outperform the screens of certain mid-range smartphones.

I’m confused. The article sounds like they’re trying to pass judgement on the display based on the cost of the entire phone.

It would kind of make sense if it was a 6” portable display.