this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
9064 readers
58 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
F1 Calendar
2024 Calendar
| Location |
Date |
| πΊπΈ United States |
21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar |
29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi |
06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You can't discuss "overtaking outside of the track" when the car on the inside line was also off track
To me it looked like Lando would've gone off track either way, and he wasn't ahead in the apex.
People on this really be downvoting common sense and facts lmao. Lando was NOT ahead in the apex, and he got a penalty for track limits. Done deal. Y'all McLaren/Lando fans told everyone that illegal rear-wing was just a legal hack, but complain when Max uses a "hack" to get ahead in a corner.
Lando got a penalty he 100% deserved there. And he got off easy too, used to often be like 10 seconds instead of 5. And he didn't get one for moving under braking either. They had like 3 reasons to penalise him.
Regardless of the apex argument, I just want consistency from the stewards. How is this any different from Sainz v Verstappen on lap 1?
And don't bring up the lap 1 argument, it wasn't even turn 1.