this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
720 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9661 readers
88 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Taking the lane shouldn't be necessary if there are actual bike lanes and you don't need to turn. This sounds like deliberately blocking traffic.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You may be correct, but if I'm not fully convinced there are proper bike lanes both ways in OOP's post.

If the cyclist provision is a "sharrow" then the bike should be in the centre of the lane. If the cyclist is turning left without proper turning infrastructure they can be in the centre of the lane. If it's a divided lane then they should be on the side.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really depends on conditions. Many “bike lanes” have unsafe road hazards, glass, are immediately in the door zone of parked cars, etc. Getting doored is one of the most common causes of cyclists being sent to the hospital with major injuries.

A well laid out, well maintained bike lane is a better alternative to taking the lane. However, in the cases where the bike lane is hazardous it’s always better to take the lane than to risk getting injured in an unsafe bike lane.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 month ago

Agreed, but "I wouldn't let him past" sounds a lot like deliberate blocking.