this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1687 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5657 readers
1743 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

It is a financial problem. Technically you can just cover the solar panels. But that's not good financially.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

Your "technically you can" is actually a huge logistical nightmare to implement.

Having electricity rates go really low is intended to incentivize people or companies to sink the excess energy to wherever they can. And also to discourage producers to produce more at that hour, if they are able to.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Really? I'm seriously asking, because I thought solar farms already had automated ways of cleaning off the panels, surely an automated way to cover the panels wouldn't be any more complex than that. It would add maintenance costs for sure, but calling it a logistical nightmare seems like an exaggeration.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You need to consider more than just solar farms. There are many roof top solar systems on people's houses. That's what I'm referring to regarding logistical nightmare.

Second, if we are just going to cover up solar panels, then it really defeats the purpose of having it. A better way is to come up with ways to store this excess energy to use when there is low production and not have to depend on fossil fuels at night.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah I understand storing and using the energy is obviously a better solution than to stop producing the energy. But in the short term, in the context of large solar arrays, until we have storage solutions or ways to use* the excess, covering the panels up or turning them to face the ground for a bit doesn't seem like a very big logisticical hurdle.

There are many roof top solar systems on people's houses. That's what I'm referring to regarding logistical nightmare.

Are there really enough residential rooftop panels for this to even be a problem? And couldn't it be solved just by installing a battery for your home to store the excess? Again, if you could explain how this would be a logistical nightmare for my ignorant self, I'd appreciate it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)