this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1427 readers
114 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (36 children)

AI artist Jason Allen

Absolute degenerate.

I have also spent some time screwing around with AI art generators. No way I'm addressing my self as an artist for it. AI art can be useful in certain situations such as whipping together a stupid meme to share between some friends. It's not any talent involved, and it's not something you should consider as copyright worthy.

Creating nice art is available to anyone. It just require some creativity and talent if you want to love of it. Being an artist is not some basic human right. As plenty of "artists" believe.

[–] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Thank heavens we have people like you to police who gets to be called an artist or not...

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Your position seems to be that art is whatever the US Copyright Office deems worthy of copyright.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)