this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
705 points (97.2% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5742 readers
775 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Holy shit, 6.4 - 6.7 bar...

Is this even possible?

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 47 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Road bicycles like the ones used in the Tour de France use pressures in the 120-140 psi range, but cars generally float around the 32 psi area.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Go to the truck stop and use the big rig hose. You'll get what you want 🤯

[–] jcs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yep, 60/80 PSI on my work truck, but the tires are 12-ply.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably less these days as it’s shown lower pressures and larger tires can improve performance.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which type of performance? Surely not fuel economy/emissions?

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes fuel economy. Energy expended per distance traveled or power needed to maintain a given speed. Just the fuel in this case is burned by your own body.

At world class levels, a few watts here and there will make a big difference by the end of a race.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aah, gotcha. I had thought that

Probably less these days

was in reference to this part at the end of the parent comment:

cars generally float around the 32 psi area

and I haven't seen anything to contradict all the previous literature on under-inflated automobile tires being worse for fuel economy.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it’s because the theory has been that high pressure decreases tire deformation and this is more efficient. This is where the wisdom of under inflated tires become less efficient. However lower pressure (like 80-90 psi) allows bicycle tires to absorb road imperfections and vibrations which actually ends up slightly more efficient. But if you go too low efficiency will be negatively affected.

Airplane tires actually have very high pressures to prevent hydroplaning, which is more important than ride quality or fuel efficiency for them.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Also planes have to land, and the impact on the tires is like hitting a pothole. You don't want the tires to touch rim at ~200 MPH on a many-million-dollar vehicle

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Source?

All the studies I've read (and my experience) show that narrower tires and higher pressures improve economy. Less traction and less ride comfort are the tradeoffs, respectively.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

GCN has a number of videos on this subject: https://youtu.be/jTZfrBVr5pQ?si=M5v6KP5ZZ9ZU5MXz

https://youtu.be/AK5KLvrzrb4?si=aMcYxYnWi9poZ8SA

And here is some technical data from SRAM: https://www.sram.com/globalassets/publicsites/cms-campaign-pages-not-story-pages/zipp/totalsystemeffeciency/pdf-downloads/tse-explained2.pdf

Basically new data includes vibration losses which get larger as pressure increases. There’s a sweet spot to balance between rolling resistance (which decreases with pressure) and vibration (which increases with pressure). So when you mention ride comfort as a trade off, it actually has a much larger effect than you might imagine.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for the videos and the PDF, but they are all bicycle related.

A car has a whole sophisticated subsystem dedicated for absorbing vibrations (the suspension), so I'm not sure the results can be applied there...

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh I was only addressing this:

Road bicycles like the ones used in the Tour de France use pressures in the 120-140 psi range,

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Suspension is great for smoothing out low frequency unevenness, but not so much for high frequencies, like something the size of gravel- a spring will ring like a bell.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

That's why a suspension is much more than a spring.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Tops on my trucks is 44

[–] _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not in a car... But 10 or 12 ply truck/tractor/trailer tires can run around 90 psi

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I just looked it up. It seems that normal car tires will explode at 115 - 145 psi.

[–] _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In not really talking about possible, I am more talking real world running pressure.

I'm sure you can air up a car tire but at 90 psi it would be so rock hard that travel on it would be extremely uncomfortable. Also you would risk blowing it out whenever you went over a big enough bump. The tire volume inside would deform and cause a massive pressure spike.

Tractor trailer tires are made with more layers of rubber and steel belting so they can safely handle higher pressures.

[–] jcs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Right, you would likely pop a tire on your friendly neighborhood pothole. Even if you were lucky and avoided all of that, the tires will bulge in the center, drastically reducing the contact patch with the ground and you'd have probably 15-35% traction compared to proper inflation.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Unless you want to end up in a watchpeopledie sub