Asklemmy

43940 readers

550 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

If everyone on this list got to debate, how would you structure the presidential debates? (ballotpedia.org)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Would everyone just make a video and people could watch the videos of who they liked best?

I'm guessing that would be like video dating except worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ballot access is made very difficult by the duopoly. And, polls are basically fucked by bias.

Many of the best hypothetical solutions are based on votes. But, all of them have prerequisite of RCV.

For a more immediate solution, 5% of the GE POTUS vote puts an organization on every ballot in the next cycle. It'd be much more difficult to rationalize exclusion from debates when such a choice exists for everyone.