this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

989 readers
9 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] self@awful.systems 26 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Literally the first human-cpu interface?

I wish I had the confidence of a techbro who thinks any of the BCI tech in neuralink is new and isn’t just a set of techniques that have existed for decades and have a shitty track record

the only thing neuralink seems to add is wireless control, which doesn’t work, partially due to impossible bandwidth and compression requirements, but mostly because it’s a project driven by Musk’s whims

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (10 children)

partially due to impossible bandwidth and compression requirements

It still amazes me they publicly posted a request for help with these compression req which are physically impossible to achieve. Nobody with a CS degree is anybody near the leadership of neuralink. In other words, you are downplaying how impossible the requirements were.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

What is the original requirement? I've never seen this and I feel a mighty sneer that I'm missing. A Fear of Sneering Out if you will.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Some 100 times+ compression, very fast and also at very low power (because it was inside the brain), and lossless.

And not stated but because it was inside the brain, I assume possible memory usage also wasn't that high etc. Sorry have no direct link to the specs.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

I assume possible memory usage also wasn’t that high

ye iirc we can remember like 7 things so that might be hard /s

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Soyweiser @V0ldek

The multi-electrode systems at the lab I worked in 2009 used a fiber connection to the host PC and generated terabytes of data, for just 128 or 92 electrodes (I forget) at not-all-that-many samples per second.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry what is the point here? Or do you just want to share a cool story about data transfer? (I'm not trying to be snarky, I feel like im missing something here).

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Soyweiser

Just an example of the data involved in a brain-computer interface.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 4 months ago

look, with the 200x compression,

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)