LinkedinLunatics

3584 readers

195 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

330

Belching (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)

Should be age > (my_age / 2) +7

[–] Gladaed 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Uh, no no. The rule is "half my age plus seven". I've no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.

[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago

This "rule" only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish

If you are 14 then the range for "age" is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for "age" is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for "age" is 27 - 66

At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.

load more comments (10 replies)