this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
128 points (99.2% liked)
World News
32290 readers
533 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While there’s nothing about the story that’s hard to believe given Israel’s love for genocide and harming anyone who cares about the humanity of Palestinians, can we get a source that isn’t literally Iran?
Edited to add:
https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2024-09-10/statement-attributable-the-spokesperson-for-the-secretary-general%C2%A0–%C2%A0-gaza
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/shots-fired-bulldozers-rammed-cars-during-un-standoff-with-israeli-military-2024-09-10/
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/09/09/middleeast/israel-gaza-united-nations-convoy-intl-latam
Reuters and CNN launder lies for israel. Iran doesn't.
The article is well sourced, I don't care what MBFC thinks.
Then use Al Jazeera. But if Trump Media tells me it’s rainy in the Pacific Northwest I’m going to have doubts, and if Iran says Israel’s doing Israel things… I’m going to have doubts.
I doubt every news source if they make claims without sources not just Iranian ones. Especially since most mainstream newspapers "anonymous source" turns out to be the IDF.
In this case the source is stated
That’s fine, but I think you’ll be able to reach/influence more people with intentional source selection.
In this example, if Iran claims the UN said that, I’d still go and confirm it (which I did). If Al Jazeera or Reuters says he said it, I don’t feel the need to double check; I know they won’t flat out lie. Someone lazier than I was here might just remember this story as a “maybe” if they didn’t bother checking the source themselves.
Your Reuters link is actually a great example of why I choose not to use their article. and use a better Iranian news source.
Anyone reading the Reuters headline would think there was some kind of "standoff battle" betweeen the UN and IDF, instead of israel firing at aid workers and ramming them with bulldozers without provocation.