this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Antiwork

8184 readers
4 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
0
Animals suffer for meat production – and abattoir workers do too (theconversation.com)
submitted 3 months ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I cited more than one study. The other ones looked at average real world spending data

[–] PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

so why include the misleading one?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I disagree with your premise that it is misleading at all. Including things that the majority of the population does not do nor can scale to the overall population would not work for a modeling study. Most people are not hunters, including that in a cost estimation study would just be giving people a false sense of true cost. Real world data would be more reliable way for that if you wanted to try to include that in a more realistic way

[–] PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

most people get at least some of their food for free, subsidized, or through farming, gardening, or hunting. this study only accounted for foods taht people buy. it's misleading to claim this represents accurately how much people spend on food.