this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1121 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1435 readers
182 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, if you mean literally, a little boredom is good for the brain.

If you mean why should we strive to make kids have a good vocabulary, it's so that they can communicate with others and be able to understand the world better.

If you mean why should we strive to make kids appreciate art, it's because art is good for kids' brains, for everyone's brains.

If you just mean you can't force all kids to be into the same things, yes, I agree. But all should learn math, reading at an adult level, comfortably, sciences, art of some sort, and physical education of some sort.

You aren't better off just always doing what comes easy to you. Forcing your mind and body to do things that are difficult is what makes you stronger and smarter. The learning difficult books that you disdain so thoroughly will make it both easier and more fun to read, eventually, but also just trains your mind to handle language better.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I read plenty of books in school, well over 5 cover to cover, and I still hate reading.

There is no truth in any book that I can't learn from a good Sean Cody film.

I think your platitudes sound nice, but in a world of limited time, we'd be better off scrapping 1-2 years of English and replacing it with Genetics classes or Ecology classes at the high school level. Fiction books are mostly just an older technology of Netflix, and yet people cling to the idea of books being virtuous for Emeperor's New Clothes-style pretentiousness.

The environmental catastrophy the world seems intent on diving head first into.(without knowing the depth) seems more pressing than some teenager becoming a sesquipidalian via extreme boredom.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

5?

OK you have to be trolling.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why is that trolling? At least 5 but cover to cover. Like that i read all of it, not just like parts and the back cover.

I skimmed many books, well over 10.

I dont get why some people have a hard time believing some people find reading boring?

I stand by everything in the prior post.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine a school that would teach only 5 literature books, my kids did more than that EACH year and even the terrible incomplete education I got in K-12 here when we were the bottom of the barrel state in the bottom of the barrel nation in terms of education involved more than 5 books a year.

My kid who dislikes reading and wants to go into trades, even that kid has read more than 5 books voluntarily outside of school, and certainly more than 60 in the course of their education so far. I can't imagine all of them being boring - I read some of them too, if my kids recommended them to me - Brodek's Report was one I remember reading after my kid had to buy it for school, it was so good.

I just thought your " I read books, five of them at least" had to be a joke. If my kids here in the state of Florida have to do more, I can't imagine any educational system requiring only a few.

[–] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They required a lot more, probably hundreds. Very few I read cover to cover. Reading is boring to me. I have no reason to waste my tike on things I find boring or increase my sufferring level. I probably skimmed briefly and read the back cover of hundreds of books.