this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
239 points (96.1% liked)

movies

1817 readers
103 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 13 points 2 months ago (9 children)

The scale is neither linear nor logarithmic. What?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think it is logarithmic, it's just marked linearly.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Logarithmic cannot start at 0 and would have equal spacing between 500, 1000 and 2000.

I am confused because the font seems to be Aptos, the current default in Micro$oft Office, but Excel does not allow any other type of scale on X-Y plots.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's not equal spacing - 1000-1500 is a bit longer than 1500-2000.

The graph is almost certainly logarithmic. Only the markings are stupid.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every time a number doubles (or increases 10Γ—, or 𝑒×, whatever), it moves a constant distance on a log scale because its base-whatever logarithm increases by a constant amount. Hence my expectation of equal distance from 500 to 1000 and 1000 to 2000. I am ignoring 1500 here because it does not form a geometric sequence with any two other numbers so it can't easily be used for this check.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)