this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024

126 points (75.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers

495 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

126

How do you make someone understand that being drafted by force and ordered to invade another country is not a good thing? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 months ago by index@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

207 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As title, if you have post or link any useful resource you have

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Whether Russia broke international laws by invading isn’t even a point of debate: I’ve yet to encounter a single person who thinks otherwise. If that’s the point you’re trying to make then congratulations Captain Obvious

Then you're an absolute dogshit mod, either not looking or not recognising Russian trolls who are plentiful even on Lemmy.

Whether Russia broke international laws by invading isn’t even a point of debate

So you're still refusing to answer the question?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Then you’re an absolute dogshit mod, either not looking or not recognising Russian trolls who are plentiful even on Lemmy.

There are approximately zero Russian trolls, but there are plenty of conspiracy theorists who think there are.

IT Pro: Cambridge Analytica models were exaggerated and ineffective, [UK Information Commissioner’s Office] claims
Wall Street Journal: Mueller Doesn’t Find Trump Campaign Conspired With Russia
Jacobin: Democrats and Mainstream Media Were the Real Kremlin Assets
Washington Post: FEC fines DNC, Clinton for violating rules in funding Steele dossier
Washington Post: Russian trolls on Twitter had little influence on 2016 voters
Jacobin: It Turns Out Hillary Clinton, Not Russian Bots, Lost the 2016 Election
Matt Taibbi: Move Over, Jayson Blair: Meet Hamilton 68, the New King of Media Fraud The Twitter Files reveal that one of the most common news sources of the Trump era was a scam, making ordinary American political conversations look like Russian spywork
Jacobin: Why the Twitter Files Are in Fact a Big Deal On the Left, there’s been a temptation to dismiss the revelations about Twitter’s internal censorship system that have emerged from the so-called Twitter Files project. But that would be a mistake: the news is important and the details are alarming.
MSNBC Repeats Hamilton 68 Lies 279 Times in 11 Minutes
Jeff Gerth at Columbia Journalism Review on Russiagate: Editor's Note | Part one | Part two | Part three | Part four
Matt Taibbi: WMD, Part II: CIA "Cooked The Intelligence" To Hide That Russia Favored Clinton, Not Trump In 2016
Chris Hedges: Why Russiagate Won’t Go Away

Whether Russia broke international laws by invading isn’t even a point of debate

So you’re still refusing to answer the question?

You are being utterly ridiculous, so yes. I don’t know why you’re doubling down on sounding like a 12 year old.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are approximately zero Russian trolls

Good one, mate. Are you trying to say bad actors who are literally employed by Russia, but ignoring all the people who've bought into the propaganda enough to propagate them despite not getting financially compensated by the state of Russia?

Are you seriously trying to say the existence of Russian propaganda on Lemmy is zero percent? I sincerely doubt that, because I'm sure you're aware of just how ridiculous of a statement that is.

"You're being utterly ridiculous by asking one simple question, to which I would avoid the answer were I on the side of Russian rhetoric."

You're making a mountain out of a molehill. I asked a simple question; do you agree that Russia has broken international law with a war of aggression by invading Ukraine?

It really doesn't necessitate getting upset nor all the equicovation. What's more ridiculous: listing a bunch of links trying to imply there's no such thing as Russian propaganda when asked if you think it was wrong of Russia to invade Ukraine... or... asking someone a simple yes or no question?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you seriously trying to say the existence of Russian propaganda on Lemmy is zero percent?

Approximately so, yes, certainly not enough to merit concern. Virtually no one in the world knows that Lemmy exists, it is new, it has no marketing/advertising, and it has under 100K active users. Do you really think we’re on the Russian state’s radar?

Maybe you should go back to Reddit, where you won’t be exposed to genuine opinions from real people that differ from yours, back to the AlwaysTheSameMap corporate social media bubble.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Approximately so

"Do you really think we're on the Russian state's radar"?

So again you're pretending propaganda only exists in the form of people who are financially compensated or mandated by the Russian state. That's insanely childish of a take. You either have really bad reading comprehension, or you're engaging with me in bad faith. Latter is against the rules, I believe?

It's weird how you can pretend to have asserted that you have implicitly agreed with the fact that Russia has broken international laws with an illegal war of aggression by invading Ukraine. If you're not pro-Russian, then it should be rather easy to say "Yes, Russia has broken international law."

Even with your notion of propaganda being spread purely by paid actors, you admit that there's a non-zero chance of that happening on Lemmy. Now, IF there was such an actor here, would they have a problem with admitting that Russia has broken international law with a war of aggression by invading Ukraine? I believe they would. Wouldn't you?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh I see, I missed this part: “ignoring all the people who’ve bought into the propaganda,” probably because I’ve stopped paying attention.

Like I said, some people are going to have different opinions from you. You can engage with them, downvote them, or leave.

Now, IF there was such an actor here, would they have a problem with admitting that Russia has broken international law with a war of aggression by invading Ukraine?

frothingfash You got us, we’re all GRU agents. Lemmy is one big psyop.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To recap, you — a mod — proudly admit you don't have the attention span to read the things on the forum you're a mod on, even the ones you're actively taking part in?

Hey, you're free to disagree with me.

Ofc I'm going to judge you for being pro-Russian, as that's just shameful. However, I assume that you won't be able to answer whether you are or aren't, despite pretending that you already have, even though people who have the attention spans to actually read the thread can clearly see you haven't — you've spent a lot of energy avoiding it. This reminds of the time I was in an elevator with a drunk guy who loudly shat his pants and then proclaimed "it wasn't me!" (And it was very clearly just the two of us in there.)