this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37679 readers
173 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Photos are never a concrete representation of the reality. Photos are being pre-processed by image processor already and we also got Photoshop. One can even fake a film based photo if he knows what to do. The proliferation of image generation models and impainting models make the access easier but image manipulation tools always exist.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The thing is, faking them went from a State can do it, to a professional can do it, an experienced amateur can do it, to absolutely everyone can

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think this is the crux of the article. In the past most people have considered photographic evidence to be very convincing. Sure, you could be removed from a photo of Stalin, and later people could do photoshop (with varying realism), now it’s a few words to make changes that many people believe without hesitation. Soon it will happen to video too, very soon.

Most people are not ready for it. Even shitty AI photos on social media get huge reactions with barely a handful calling them out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)