this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
338 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26715 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schoegge@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Wasn't that ~~the~~ on the planet where the engineer people lived? So it came from them?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That implies the Engineers gave humanity modern wheat despite all evidence to the contrary. Or took our modern wheat back to their abandoned and dead planet despite all movie evidence to the contrary.

It's just a stupid plot point in a movie full of them, but it did have xenomorphs murdering the dumbest scientists in existence so it's not all bad.

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What evidence to the contrary?

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably the fact that we can track the development of modern wheat from a natural grain to what it is today.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

Of course, this is also the series that had the engineers "life seed" Earth with literally just a dude breaking down into DNA. Because why shouldn't an incredibly advanced alien species splooge into a river 4 billion years ago then just let it cook until it's time to abduct and train Jesus?

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's called Suspension of Disbelief. This is a science FICTION film. It will not fit neatly into reality lmao

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Are you telling me a movie about aliens isn't fact...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)