this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
110 points (85.7% liked)

Communism

1612 readers
95 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I think Ghandi led a non-violent revolution, to be fair

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ghandi's revolution succeeded through mass noncompliance.

Nonviolence was a luxury Ghandi could afford during the revolution because Indians outnumbered British soldiers by something like 20k to 1. There was no world where the recently weakened UK (after WW2) could hold India once it decided to become independent.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Point seems to have been that it was a succesful non-violent revolution

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article I posted above gets into this, but it was not. The British did not quit India because some guy went on a hunger strike, and they actively propagate pacifist myths like his because they are completely unthreatening.

load more comments (1 replies)