this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
1051 points (88.5% liked)

solarpunk memes

2872 readers
957 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Primaries aren't restrictive, its just that nobody actually votes in them. I think the highest turnout in USA history was 36.9 Million people in a primary election, chosen to represent 81 Million DNC Voters and again to represent 329.5 Million Americans total.

There is a huge problem with campaign finance laws in the USA, despite our many laws regulating it, and admittedly not having a democracy would fix that specific problem, but it sure as fuck won't make any American's lives better.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Primaries aren’t restrictive

Parties in the US are considered private organizations and party chairs have enormous power, as a result.

Utah Republican Accused of Trying to 'Steal an Election' by GOP

Currently in the courts, because this degree of infighting is cutting across a number of people with real power and influence. But for less high-profile candidates, this is absolutely something a party official can (and periodically will) do, when the party leadership doesn't want a contested primary.

There is a huge problem with campaign finance laws in the USA, despite our many laws regulating it, and admittedly not having a democracy would fix that specific problem

I would argue that having the problem makes the system undemocratic. When you can buy your way onto a ticket and buy your competition off of it, the end voter has far less real electoral choice. And when districts bloat to the size of 600k-700k voters in the case of national House Reps and as much as 40M for Senate seats, the idea of representative democracy is stretched to its functional limit.

How does a pair California Senator seriously represent the diverse views of a state this large and varied? And not even a split pair? It isn't as though you're electing the 1st and 2nd place winners. You've got two individuals who rose to the rank largely based on how much money they could raise from friends in domestic industry. Not based on their popularity or the popularity of their policies in any meaningful sense.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

(Supposedly) Defending their rights in a court of law and participating in fair elections appears as "infighting" to you, lol.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Defending their rights in a court of law

Getting stripped off the ballot by an unelected official and having to run to a court of other unelected officials to be reinstated does not sound like any kind of democracy to me.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just chiming in to thank you for putting in the effort. You're getting downvoted for it but you're fighting the good fight, you're not alone, and I'm certain that at least someone read your comments and began questioning their beliefs.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

He said something negative about China at one point, it was bound to happen.

I'm already mostly on his side, but well thought out.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz -5 points 3 months ago

For someone who types so many words, you struggle to make a factual point worth reading..